|
– HOMBURG –
[Pagus:- 1. Bliesgau (fragment)
c. 1121-1449. 2. Nordgau (fragment) c. 1125-c. 1181. Numbering
conventions: Landgrave Dietrich of Lower Alsace is treated as Dietrich
I of Homburg.]
The counts of Homburg represent the most junior comital
line of the Folmars, but for several decades perhaps the most glorious.
The genealogical reconstruction of the early twelfth-century Folmars
is rife with conundrums, but much comes into focus through the resolution
of a minor chronological discrepancy. Dietrich I, whose original castle
was probably the Hunenburc in Alsace, emerges in 1121 and is
associated in some way with the line of the counts of Blieskastel. We
can affiliate him directly with Count Godfrey I of Blieskastel on the
understanding that (1) he was born of a later marriage than his elder
brothers, and (2) his mother transmitted right that culminated in his
attainment of the landgravate of Lower Alsace.
Oriented thus , mention of Landgrave Dietrich’s mother can actually be discovered
in the chronicle of Alberic of Troisfontaines: she is Mathilde ‘of
Castris (Blieskastel), Homburg and Longwy’. Alberic of Troisfontaines, who is relatively
late and not always reliable, makes her a sister of Ermesinde of Luxembourg,
but she is much more likely to be a sister-in-law – that is, a
sister of Ermesinde’s first husband Count Adalbert of Dagsburg.
This will provide, in the first case, rights to jurisdiction in Nordgau,
thus a presence in Lower Alsace from which the landgravial office could
develop.
At Dietrich’s death around 1148 the landgravial office
passed to his eldest son Godfrey, but his younger sons Otto and Dietrich
II both appear with comital title (beginning in 1159). As elsewhere
among the Folmars, the comital office proliferated according to family
structure rather than descend logically according to a unitary principle.
But the higher offices were always unitary, of course, and
the landgravial office subsequently passed to the house of Werd. We must therefore
assume that Landgrave Godfrey had a daughter, and that she married Sigebert
III of Werd. This will make understandable the fact that the county
of Homburg – now associated with a castle in the Saarland –
passed down the line without carrying the landgravate
or anything of the importance of the predecessors.
SHIELD
The Homburg shield of gueules with lion in argent
is closely related to the lion shield of Dagsburg-Egisheim, and among descendants
of the Folmars it is the sole lion shield. We can attribute these circumstances
in large part to the landgravial office, where relationship between
the counts of Dagsburg and Homburg was such that a right to landgravial
office devolved on the latter at the premature death of Count Hugo VII
of Dagsburg in 1123. Lothar of Supplinburg, who came to the throne in
1125, appears not only to dispense lion shields but also to disseminate the landgravial
office judiciously. The minority that existed in the comital house of Dagsburg
at this time probably explains not only why the landgravate arrived
to Homburg, but also why the lion shield of Dagsburg was devised with
a border, as though a brisure.
Homburg: gueules, lion d’argent

Dagsburg: argent, lion de sable, bordure de gueules
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Sources: – Alberic of Troisfontaines,
Chronicon (MGH, Scriptores XXIII).
Literature: – Eyer, F. “Die
Landgrafschaft im unteren Elsass.” ZGO 117 (1969) 161-78.
– Herrmann, H.-W. “Die Grafen von Metz-Lunéville
und ihre Verzweigungen.” In Geschichtliche Landeskunde des
Saarlandes, II. Pp. 244-53. – Herrmann, H.-W. “Die Grafen
von Homburg.” In Geschichtliche Landeskunde des Saarlandes,
II. Pp. 266-73. – Herrmann, H.-W. “Die Grafen von Homburg.
Beiträge zur Geschichte eines Westricher Adelsgeschlechtes.”
MHVP 77 (1979) 27-76. – Legl, Dagsburg-Egisheim.
– Möller, Stamm-Tafeln. – Parisse, Noblesse
et chevalerie. – Witte, “Genealogische Untersuchungen
(II).”
[abbreviations]
[section heading]
|